Skip to content
  • ABOUT
  • WRITING
  • SPEAKING
  • ADVOCACY
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

ALBERTO ALEMANNO

Primary Menu
  • Europe
  • Democracy
  • Advocacy & Lobbying
  • Health
  • Risk Regulation

Lack of citizens at EU’s citizens’ debate raises eyebrows

THE GUARDIAN - Jennifer Rankin - 18/06/21

Analysis: legitimacy of Future of Europe talks called into question as only a quarter of citizens likely to take part

Ursula von der Leyen insists citizens will ‘play a leading and active part in building the future of our union’. Photograph: Reuters

The socially distanced places are set, the guests will soon arrive. Everything is ready for the EU’s most ambitious attempt to debate with citizens. Everything, except most of the citizens who are meant to be involved.

The Conference on the Future of Europe, an 11-month consultation whose centrepiece will be citizens’ assemblies across the EU, holds its first working session at the European parliament in Strasbourg on Saturday. While a full complement of EU politicians and officials are expected in the Rhine city, only about 27 citizens are likely to take part – a quarter of the total who would usually participate in such meetings, according to the conference website.

That might seem odd for a project billed by European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, as one where citizens “play a leading and active part in building the future of our union”. An EU official insisted, however, that everything was going to plan. “There is no delay: the European citizens’ panels will start meeting as of September or October, and we are on time for this.” Although the project has been under discussion for more than three years, the selection of citizens’ panels – representative groups of people from all corners of the EU – is incomplete.

Guy Verhofstadt, the veteran EU politician and a co-chair of the conference, dismissed suggestions that the absence of many citizens at the start undermines the legitimacy of the project. “The decisions will not be taken in June. The decisions will be taken in March, in February [2022] when the conclusions will be taken,” he said this week. “What you are saying is that the whole purpose of this conference is to liaise with citizens. Not at all. The purpose of this conference is to elaborate a vision, a new vision of the future of Europe … and we want to do that based on the input of citizens.” Meanwhile, organisers expected 67 EU citizens to take part in an event in Portugal on Thursday.

Verhofstadt, an ardent federalist, is seen by some EU governments as one of the problems of the troubled project, which has been marred by inter-institutional EU turf wars, since first adopted by Von der Leyen, as she battled to get MEPs to vote her in as commission president. The idea was first floated by Emmanuel Macron in March 2019, as the French president sought to draw lessons from Brexit. It is no accident that the conference will end during the first phases of the French presidential elections in spring 2022.

After the onset of coronavirus, many governments see the project as an unwelcome distraction. EU ministers successfully diluted Verhofstadt’s role: the Belgian is one of three co-chairs on an executive board, part of the conference’s elaborate structure.

The top-heavy bureaucratic structure, plus a founding declaration replete with jargon, such as “subsidiarity” and “stakeholders”, have not inspired some observers. The historian Timothy Garton Ash described the conference as “an orgy of introspection”. Even sympathetic observers fear the project lacks clear goals and could boost Eurosceptics, if there are no tangible benefits.

Others argue it is too soon to write off the democratic experiment. The political scientist Alberto Alemanno was one of the project’s fiercest critics, but has been won round by the final plans.

“This might be the first time the EU institutions and the member states have created an institutional mechanism they might end up not being in control of”

he said, citing the potential for citizens’ assemblies to interpret the task in their own way. The EU law professor thinks the focus on issues (global heating, jobs and health, for example) rather than the arcane business of EU treaty change, shows leaders have learnt lessons from the 2002-03 Convention on the Future of Europe that resulted in the ill-fated European constitution, rejected by French and Dutch voters in 2005.

The pan-European citizens’ assemblies – which would involve 800 people in locations yet to be decided – were a first for the EU, he added. “This conference carries the potential to act as a Trojan horse, both for new ideas and dynamics within the union. In the absence of member states’ control, some of these ideas and dynamics may actually stick.”

Damian Boeselager, the first and only MEP for Volt, a pan-European movement that wants greater public involvement in politics, is also enthusiastic. “A debate about the future of Europe itself has value and needs to be had,” he said. The benchmarks for success should be the project’s reach and whether it results in “concrete changes” to how the EU works. “It’s not a good result if this is a consultation process that ends up with a report for the European council [of EU leaders], then they discuss it for two minutes and it’s done,” he said. But first the EU needs to find some citizens.


Tags: Future of Europe, The Guardian

Continue Reading

Previous These sixteen countries are now using the EU’s COVID travel pass (EUDCC)
Next Pandemia katkaisi kansain­välisen elämäntavan, ja nyt tutkija pelkää, että paluuta ei ehkä ole

RSS READ ME IN THE GUARDIAN

  • We lived the European dream. Will any politician stand up for open borders? 22/05/2020
  • Europe doesn't have to be so helpless in this crisis 26/03/2020
  • The EU won’t fix its democratic deficit with another top-down ‘conference’ | Alberto Alemanno 21/01/2020
  • There are 17 million mobile EU citizens. We deserve a political voice | Alberto Alemanno 01/05/2019

RSS READ ME IN THE POLITICO

  • The Qatar scandal shows how the EU has a corruption problem
  • Once again, FIFA has sold its own rules and values for money
  • The end of Euro-bashing
  • Facebook vs. the EU
  • The real winner of the Italy-France dispute is Europe

PODCAST: CITIZEN LOBBYIST

EP 9 I What is European Racism? &How do we fight it?
byThe Good Lobby

This episode of Citizen Lobbyist investigates racism in Europe.

After the assassination of George Floyd, we have seen a new wave of protests and indignation not only in the US, but also in Europe. While systemic racism may be harder to spot in Europe than in the United States, the roots of racism are the same on both continents. Systemic discrimination is not only present but also perpetrated by the same institutions that should fight to prevent it.

Together with the Open Society European Policy Institute – OSEPI – we gathered four amazing female activists from different backgrounds:

Layla @Azzuzi – Collective Against Islamophobia in Belgium
Dijana Pavlovic – European Roma Institute for Arts and Culture
Violeta Naydenova – Senior Policy Analyst on Roma and Anti-discrimination at Osepi
Wetsi Mpoma – Bamko-Cran: Centre for Reflection and Action on Racism

Hey, it’s me Fiorella! :
I would love to have a 60 min discussion of the topics we discussed on Clubhouse.
If you like the idea, just send me a message and we will make it happen.

You can DM me on Instagram: @flowlav
Or send me an email at: [email protected]
Clubhouse: @flowlav

EP 9 I What is European Racism? &How do we fight it?
EP 9 I What is European Racism? &How do we fight it?
04/02/2021
The Good Lobby
EP 8 I How should lobbying be regulated?
02/12/2020
The Good Lobby
Ep7 I Why civil society matters in a post Covid-19 world
13/06/2020
The Good Lobby
Ep 6 I Why academics must work for society
20/05/2020
The Good Lobby
Ep 5 I Why people work for free? The PRO BONO phenomenon
08/05/2020
The Good Lobby
Ep 4 I The future of digital activism
24/04/2020
The Good Lobby
Ep 3 I The business of lobbying – New scenarios during the Covid-19 outbreak
09/04/2020
The Good Lobby
Ep. 2 I European Citizens' Initiative: lobbying for citizens without borders
24/03/2020
The Good Lobby
Ep. 1 I Lobbying. What is it? Can Citizens do it?
21/02/2020
The Good Lobby
Ep. 0 I Intro
27/01/2020
The Good Lobby
Search Results placeholder

SEARCH BY TAG

Alessandro Chiocchetti Angela Merkel Ashoka Bloomberg Brexit Citizen Lobbying COVID-19 Davos democracy Didier Reynders ethics EU elections Europe European Commission European Parliament Eva Kaili Forbes France Future of Europe Italy Le Monde lobbying Macron Mario Draghi Meloni Neelie Kroes Netherlands Olaf Scholz orban participation Poland policymaking Politico Qatar Qatargate Renzi Russia scotland The Good Lobby The Guardian Uber Files Ukraine vaccine Von der Leyen World Cup

ARCHIVES

  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Copyright © Alberto Alemanno - All rights reserved. 2020–2023 | Designed by Mila Branders
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookies PolicyACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT