Skip to content
  • ABOUT
  • WRITING
  • SPEAKING
  • ADVOCACY
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

ALBERTO ALEMANNO

Primary Menu
  • Europe
  • Democracy
  • Advocacy & Lobbying
  • Health
  • Risk Regulation

Can the EU Commission scrap its CAP plan?

EURACTIV - Gerardo Fortuna - 19/11/20

The European Commission’s threat to withdraw its legislative proposal for the post-2020 EU’s farming subsidies programme has irritated EU lawmakers. EURACTIV.com asked some legal experts to clear the air about the controversy.

Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and her VP Frans Timmermans leave behind former Agriculture Commissioner Phil Hogan, the father of the contested Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) proposal. [EC]

The option of scrapping the proposed reform of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) if it is not in line with the EU’s flagship environmental policy, the European Green Deal, has struck a sour note in the first weeks of negotiations between the European Parliament and the German EU presidency.

Withdrawing the proposal would halt the talks, leaving the EU executive to re-start the legislative process by tabling a new document.

After Commission Vice-President Frans Timmermans hinted at this possibility, the Commission has tried to tone down the dispute and defuse a potential institutional crisis.

In a letter seen by EURACTIV to five lawmakers affiliated to her centre-right European People’s Party (EPP), President Ursula von der Leyen said that, although the withdrawal of a proposal is always a legal and institutional possibility, the Commission is not considering it.

She added that, if underpinned by a joint determination to honour the collective commitment towards sustainability, the negotiation process between the three institutions can result in a revised CAP that is fit for purpose.

Contacted by this website, one of the MEPs said that the EPP is satisfied by von der Leyen’s assurances and even the Greens seem to have changed their target from scrapping to fixing the CAP.

A limited power

Although the political dispute seems settled, at least for the time being, some legal concerns on the Commission’s right to withdraw legislation persist.

In her letter to the EPP, von der Leyen claimed this right and did not explicitly give up on using such powers at a later stage.

The Commission’s power to withdraw its proposals is a controversial subject of legal speculations and a long-standing source of strife between the legal services of different EU institutions.

The main reason is that this power is not expressly established in the Treaties but derived from recent case-law at the EU Court of Justice (ECJ).

In a landmark ruling issued in 2016, the Luxembourg-based court stated that the right to revoke a proposal is not absolute and limited it to a specific hypothesis.

The ECJ has historically confined the exercise of the right of withdrawal to the existence of an amendment planned by the Parliament and the Council distorting the raison d’être of the original proposal.

However, in this case the Commission is not contesting amendments of co-legislators in conflict with its original CAP proposal, but it is the Commission’s proposal itself that is problematic when assessed against the Green Deal, which was presented after the CAP proposal.

If you no longer believe in it

According to Alberto Alemanno, Jean Monnet Professor in EU Law at HEC Paris, the Commission enjoys considerable discretion in deciding whether or not to withdraw a proposal, although that is slightly tempered by the Court’s case-law.

“Given the new circumstances surrounding the CAP proposal and the public policy need to realign it with the Green New Deal, it seems plausible – both legally and politically – that the EU commission is allowed to withdraw a proposal in which it no longer believes in.”

He added that, ultimately, it is a political and not legal reason preventing Timmermans from withdrawing the proposal.

New mandate, new proposal…

“My view would be that a new Commission has the right to reconsider outstanding proposals as it has a new mandate,” said Steve Peers, EU Law Professor at the University of Essex.

According to him, this right may include withdrawing proposals, as a new Commission often does, in light of new factors which may differ from the policy of the previous Commission.

Plaintiffs could assert the argument of bad timing since the new College should be entitled to withdraw proposals made by its predecessor shortly after acceding to power.

“But there’s a counter-argument that a new Commission can establish a different approach to withdrawal of a proposal even if it doesn’t withdraw it immediately,” he said.

General interest

“If it were to decide to withdraw the proposal, the Commission could reasonably argue that it should be withdrawn because it would conflict with the general interest of the Union,” said Matteo Bonelli, Assistant Professor of EU law at Maastricht University.

The change of political priorities and the risk of conflict with the general interest as defined in the Green Deal could be a sufficiently solid and objective reason to withdraw the proposal from a legal point of view, he added.

The withdrawal act requires, however, to be in compliance with the obligations imposed by the ECJ and the EU law, namely the obligation to state reasons, an objective reasons for the withdrawal and the respect for the principle of loyal cooperation, Bonelli concluded.

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Linkedin
  • Share on Reddit

Tags: European Commission

Continue Reading

Previous Deal reached to link EU funding to respect for rule of law
Next EU summit: Budget stalemate continues but Hungary not united in opposition to EU’s rule of law

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RSS READ ME IN THE GUARDIAN

  • We lived the European dream. Will any politician stand up for open borders? 22/05/2020
  • Europe doesn't have to be so helpless in this crisis 26/03/2020
  • The EU won’t fix its democratic deficit with another top-down ‘conference’ | Alberto Alemanno 21/01/2020
  • There are 17 million mobile EU citizens. We deserve a political voice | Alberto Alemanno 01/05/2019

RSS READ ME IN THE POLITICO

  • Facebook vs. the EU
  • The real winner of the Italy-France dispute is Europe
  • Time for Europe to embrace democracy
  • Will Italian populism save Europe?
  • Macron’s fake news law will threaten democracy

PODCAST: CITIZEN LOBBYIST

EP 8 I How should lobbying be regulated?
by The Good Lobby

For too long we have been regulating lobbying to prevent corruption. Yet, as lobbying is a legitimate democratic activity, the aim should instead be to open it up to everyone. In this new episode of Citizen Lobbyist, we discuss lobbying reform across the world, by taking the EU as a case in point. Professor Alemanno’s ideas for power-shifting reforms aimed at levelling the playing field will be presented.

To learn more on Regulatory Governance, don’t miss this Open Government Partnership Report
https://www.opengovpartnership.org/documents/regulatory-governance-in-the-open-government-partnership/

Find us on Twitter
@CLobbyist
@alemannoEU
@LavorgnaFior

EP 8 I How should lobbying be regulated?
EP 8 I How should lobbying be regulated?
02/12/2020
The Good Lobby
Ep7 I Why civil society matters in a post Covid-19 world
13/06/2020
The Good Lobby
Ep 6 I Why academics must work for society
20/05/2020
The Good Lobby
Ep 5 I Why people work for free? The PRO BONO phenomenon
08/05/2020
The Good Lobby
Ep 4 I The future of digital activism
24/04/2020
The Good Lobby
Ep 3 I The business of lobbying – New scenarios during the Covid-19 outbreak
09/04/2020
The Good Lobby
Ep. 2 I European Citizens' Initiative: lobbying for citizens without borders
24/03/2020
The Good Lobby
Ep. 1 I Lobbying. What is it? Can Citizens do it?
21/02/2020
The Good Lobby
Ep. 0 I Intro
27/01/2020
The Good Lobby
Search Results placeholder

SEARCH BY TAG

Aljazeera Bloomberg Brexit Citizen Lobbying COVID-19 digital EU elections European Commission Fake News Forbes France Italy Le Monde lobbying Politico politics The Guardian Trump Von der Leyen

ARCHIVES

  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Copyright © Alberto Alemanno - All rights reserved. 2020–2021 | Designed by Mila Branders
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookies PolicyACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.